The Articles of Religion
Article XXVII
Holy Baptism
Outline:
1. History
a.
Jewish
Baptism
b.
Christian
Baptism
2. The Meaning of
Baptism
a.
Scripture
b.
Membership
c.
Regeneration
3. Infant Baptism
a.
History
b.
Value
4. Baptism and Confirmation
1. History:
a. Jewish Baptism:
Ceremonial washing as preparation to
approaching God in prayer was a common feature of many religions. It was a natural symbol of purification.
Water was used for this purpose by
the Jews and is commanded in the Old Testament. [Lev. 8:6; Lev 14:9]
Jewish proselytes were baptized and
said to be born again; a new creature as in II Cor. 5:17.
The baptisms’ of John were preparatory to the coming of the
Kingdom. It was a water baptism of repentance. Similar baptisms were
performed by Jesus’ disciples during his life on earth
[John 4:1-
2], and would seem to be on a level with Johns. It would not have been a full Christian baptism.
b. Christian Baptism:
Baptism, already familiar to the
Jews, was taken by Christ and made the visible acceptance into the Christian
society. [Matt 28:19] Christ’s own baptism by John consecrated the rite for
Christians, [Matt.
4:13-17; Mark 1:9-11; Luke 3:21,22] and gave it a Messianic significance. From the beginning, the
New Testament knows of no other entrance into the Church.
Beginning with Pentecost, the
universal practice of all Churches without any debate indicates it was instituted by
Christ. [Acts 2:38].
Some writers hold that baptism was
first administered in the name of Jesus only
[Acts 2:38 in the name of Jesus
Messiah; Acts 8:16; Acts 10:40; Gal 3:27; Rom 6:3 in the name of Lord Jesus’]
It is possible that the phrases in Acts
and the Epistles are not intended to indicate the form used, but to distinguish Christian baptism from Jewish
baptism. However the trinitarian form was also used. It is possible that when our Lord spoke of
baptism ‘in the name of’ the Trinity He was expressing the nature of the life bestowed and
not necessarily the form of words to use.
St. Paul in II Cor. 13:14, shows
he expected all Corinthian Christians to be familiar with the type of teaching summed up
in the baptismal formula.
2. The Meaning of Baptism:
a. Scripture:
Scripture gives the meaning as
signifying the public acknowledgment of Jesus as Lord and entrance into the new Israel. Scripture makes it clear that baptism is not
only a sign of profession
but a means of grace.
John 3:1-8;
One must be born again “of water and Spirit” before he can enter the
kingdom. Thus baptism not only signifies
cleansing and a new life but bestows
them. Water is the symbol and channel of the
Spirit.
St. Paul speaks of the ‘bath of
regeneration’ [Titus 3:5]. Incorporated
into the body of Christ
[I Cor. 12:13; Gal 3:27]. By our nature we are in ‘Adam’: By our new
birth we are in ‘Christ’
[I Cor. 15:22]. Now the Christian is to
do all things in Christ [Eph. 1:3; Eph 2:6].
Christ is within us
[I Cor. 6:15]. We are the branches,
Christ is the vine [John 15:1]. We share
Christ’s death and burial
to rise again in newness of life [Rom. 6:3-11; Col. 3:1-3]. As a member we are called to live as such [I Cor. 6:15; Eph 5:7-9].
Peter stresses the present salvation
begun here and now through baptism [I Peter 3:20,21]
b. Membership:
The blessings of baptism mentioned
in the article are not a number of detached blessings but flow from union with Christ.
Baptism not only symbolizes a new birth but
conveys it since we are made members of Christ.
The Church is Christ’s body. The metaphor of grafting comes from Rom.
11:17. Gentiles are like wild olive grafted onto the ancient
stock of the true olive and enriched by its life.
In the New Testament baptism is always ‘unto the remission
of sins’; a visible sign of God’s forgiveness. [Acts 2:37,38; I Cor. 6:11; Eph 5:26]. Those who repent and are baptized have faced their sin in
penitence by coming to Christ to receive from Him a new life.
It is through Christ that we receive the adoption of sons
[Gal 4:4,5]. In
Romans St. Paul writes,’But ye received the
spirit of adoption, whereby we cry Abba, Father.” We are the “elect people of God’ [Rom. 16:13;
Eph. 1:4] and are inheritors of His Kingdom.
The meaning of “faith is confirmed:
and grace is increased by virtue of prayer unto God.” is somewhat obscure. If this has in mind adult baptism only then
it is the faith of the baptized that is confirmed and the grace of the
baptized that is increased. If this
refers also to infants then the simplest interpretation is that the
increased blessing is won for the baptized by the prayers of the bystanders.
c. Regeneration:
The Prayer Book means by
regeneration simply incorporated into Christ.
All baptized persons are ‘regenerate’ in this sense.
In a very real sense John’s baptism
was a mark of regeneration, of a new birth unto righteousness in anticipation of the dawning Kingdom
of the Christ. Its background in prophetic
teaching is probably
best seen in such a passage as Ezekiel 36: 25-27. The Prayer Book very clearly intends that Baptism
include regeneration and the new birth.
In the invocation we pray; ‘We call upon thee for this thy servant that he, coming
to thy Holy Baptism, may receive remission of sin, by spiritual regeneration.”In
the Thanksgiving we pray: ‘Give thy Holy Spirit to this thy servant that he may
be born
again,’.
Some identify regeneration with
conversion. - the spiritual renewal resulting from
membership with Christ. It includes turning the will towards god and
the personal acceptance of Christ.
Renewal of the
soul requires both the gift of the grace of God in baptism and the personal
surrender of the will to that
grace. Regeneration is the work God does
in us, in renewing our fallen nature.
We should be both regenerated and
converted. Regeneration is the work of
God, accomplished in a
moment. Conversion is our work in
conjunction with God; it calls for effort and self-surrender. It may be either rapid or slow.
In the Calvinist view, since God’s
grace is irresistible and given only to the elect, it follows that sacraments cannot in any
real sense be ‘means of grace’.
Rather they are pledges or seals of blessings already belonging to the
recipient as a child of grace.
3. Infant
Baptism:
History:
The practice of infant baptism dates
from Apostolic times.
Parents who were baptized would never thought of entering into a religion by
themselves but would have had the whole household baptized.
Child proselytes to Judaism were baptized.
There is no positive mention of infant
baptism in the New Testament. There is
also no age limit. Silence on the
subject can be looked on as proof of infant baptism.
Whole households
were baptized [Acts 16:15; I Cor. 1:16] St. Peter
bids men to be baptized “for to you is the promise and to your
children”. Paul speaks of children “in
the Lord” [Col. 3:20; Eph. 6:1]
Infant Baptism was
practiced in the early Church. Tertullian objects to infant baptism but not on doctrinal grounds.
Value in Practice:
Children receive from God the best
they are capable of receiving in baptism.
Faith and repentance are necessary for
baptism. But spiritual life is the free
gift of God and if there
is no disbelief or sin to oppose God’s mercy, then faith is not
required for them to receive it. Also, faith is provided
for them by their Godparents by proclaiming their faith in the name of the
child. The Lord blessed children small
enough to be incapable of faith [Mark 10:13-16]. Faith is always required to receive God’s blessing,
where faith can be expected. But Christ
invited children to come
to Him.
Infant baptism embodies a spiritual
principle; That religion stars with what God does for
us. God’s love and His free gifts come
first. “We love Him because He first
loved us.” When children are baptized, their baptism remains as a ground of appeal
later on if they do wrong. We do not judge them to be good
first and then baptize them. They are
Christians and must live like Christians.
Baptized infants not only receive the
power of new life but are placed in the Church where this new life can be progressively
developed. A baptized child needs food
and nursing for his soul to grow up spiritually sound.
Godparents are necessary in order to
see that the child is taught all that his life means, in the name of the Church. Baptismal regeneration should not be
separated from the thought of the Church as God’s family. It is doubtful that we should baptize
children indiscriminately, with no real security that they will be brought up as the Prayer Book directs.
The parents, Godparents and other
sponsors of the child should be baptized members of Christ’s Church. They promise three things in the name of the
child:
(1) The child is repentant and renounces all sin;
(2) The child has faith in God the Father, God the Son and
God the Holy Ghost; the forgiveness of
sins; the resurrection of the body; and salvation;
(3) The child will keep God’s holy will and commandments all
the days of his life.
4. Baptism and Confirmation:
In Apostolic times baptism appears
to include the laying on of hands [Acts 19:6; Heb. 6:2], and possibly anointing with oil [II Cor. 1:21,22; I John 2:20,27]. There was also baptizing with water alone [Acts
8:38; Acts 9:18]. In Acts 8:12-17,
baptism is distinctly separated from the laying on of hands with its gift of the
Spirit. Phillip possessed only the
authority to baptize - the Apostles came to lay on hands. In
the custom of the early church, baptism, unction and the laying on of hands formed a single
sacrament. Confirmation is a late title
and purely western. Only Bishops could lay on hands and they
could not always be obtained. Thus the
two ceremonies for baptism and confirmation.
In early times confirmation was part
of a single ceremony of initiation into the Church; The candidate was transformed from life in this world to
the life of the Church; cleansed from sin;
made a member of Christ; anointed with the Holy Ghost and sealed unto
the day of redemption. It was a once-for-all
ceremony. By the 3rd and 4th
centuries, confirmation was said to bestow the Holy Ghost.
Side by side with this view the Fathers also speak as though baptism
with water was of sole
importance. At the
reformation, the Church of England retained the separation of infant baptism and
confirmation but:
(a) Including in confirmation the renewing of Baptismal
vows, and
(b) re-affirmed that admission to
Holy Communion was restricted to the confirmed.
In the Greek Church
baptism and confirmation are still one.
Infants are baptized and annointed with oil specially
blessed by the Bishop. Anglicans have
dropped unction and the Romans the laying on of hands. It is doubtful that unction or the laying on
of hands can claim any higher
authority than the custom of the Church. In Heb. 6:2, the laying on of hands is
included among the first
principles of Christ.
Three views on Confirmation: While we
have a desire to maintain the traditional Anglican practice, there is a theological question of the
relation of the gift in baptism to that in confirmation.
(1) Persons baptized in infancy, explicitly take on
responsibility for obedience for vows taken in their name. Through this personal act of faith and
responsibility, baptism comes to its fulfilment
and the confirmation service is blessed by the Church. This view has a continuous history from the 16th
century.
(2) In confirmation, the laying on of hands takes on a more
sacramental character and is the means of a special gift of
strengthening by the Holy Ghost. This
view receives considerable
support from the Prayer Book. In the
Baptismal service we pray “give the Holy Spirit to this infant that he may
be born again.” In confirmation, the
Bishop prays that the
confirmed “may daily increase in the
Holy Spirit.”
(3) A third view regards confirmation as a sacramental act
begun in baptism and bestows the gift of the Holy Spirit. Thus baptism as a
sacrament is incomplete until confirmation.
The prayer
(from the Gelasian Sacramentary)
which precedes the laying-on of hands appears
to imply that the seven-fold gift is now o be given for the first
time. Also persons baptized as an adult are not dispensed from
confirmation.
Taken from
The Thirty Nine Articles of the Church of England by E. J. Bicknell
Third Edition
revised by H. J. Carpenter
LTS March 2000